Ensuring accurate responses
I’m thinking about avoiding hallucinations when we’re unsure of specific sources. My knowledge goes up to October 2024, and today’s date is December 27, 2025. It seems that I might have browsing enabled by default, but I don’t want to assume anything without clarity. I believe we can simply respond without needing external facts. The user likely wants this formatted as news or for social media, so I need to offer options. Let's keep it concise!Crafting options for the user
I'm thinking about providing two or three options for the user to choose from. Maybe I can suggest a quick news blurb of around 80 to 120 characters, along with three potential headlines. I should also consider whether they'd like background details about Neuer's age, contract, and Ulreich's performance. For safety, I'll avoid precise numbers but can mention general contexts. Finally, I’ll prepare a news version, a social media post, and three key points for discussion. Let's ask for their preference!
你这像是一条新闻线索。需要我做哪种处理?

先给你几版现成的,你选喜欢的风格我再细化。

资讯快讯 埃芬博格表示,希望未来乌尔比希能成长为拜仁的一门;在诺伊尔长期占据首发的背景下,他称赞乌尔比希是一名“非常出色的替补”,在需要时总能稳定顶上。相关言论也被解读为对拜仁门将位置接班话题的积极信号。
标题备选

社媒文案(微博风) 埃芬博格发声:乌尔比希现在是“稳”的替补,未来有望成拜仁一门。诺伊尔长期首发的格局下,这番力挺释放了什么信号?你觉得乌尔比希有首发潜质吗?
简短解读要点
位置格局:诺伊尔健康时基本锁定首发,乌尔比希主要承担轮换与紧急顶替。

价值认可:对“可靠替补”的肯定,强调其临场稳定性与更衣室价值。
接班想象:更多是“看好潜力”的态度表达,实际接班仍取决于竞技状态与球队规划。
需要我:A) 扩写成600-800字稿,B) 换成更硬新闻口吻,C) 定制成公众号/视频口播稿?